Search for: "In Re IT Group, Inc., Co." Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2014, 10:01 pm by Cathy Siegner
Food Safety News: You’re a co-sponsor of the change.org petition against importing Chinese-processed chicken into the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504, 530 (1992), where the Supreme Court first rejected notion that torts were somehow different from other forms of government regulation. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
La première proposition des appelants ne satisfait donc pas au critère de l’apparence de droit. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am by DMLP Staff
Delaney (Bean, Kinney & Korman, P.C.)Verdict or Settlement Amount: $1,500.00Source of Law: United StatesVirginiaCourt Name: Circuit Court for the City of AlexandriaLegal Counsel: Paul Alan Levy and Scott Michelman (Public Citizen Litigation Group), and Raymond D. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am by DMLP Staff
Delaney (Bean, Kinney & Korman, P.C.)Verdict or Settlement Amount: $1,500.00Source of Law: United StatesVirginiaCourt Name: Circuit Court for the City of AlexandriaLegal Counsel: Paul Alan Levy and Scott Michelman (Public Citizen Litigation Group), and Raymond D. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am by DMLP Staff
Delaney (Bean, Kinney & Korman, P.C.)Source of Law: United StatesVirginiaLegal Claims: ConspiracyDefamationCourt Name: Circuit Court for the City of AlexandriaLegal Counsel: Paul Alan Levy and Scott Michelman (Public Citizen Litigation Group), and Raymond D. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v 3M Co, the 11th Circuit found that the defendant had no “intention to profit” where the defendant indicated no intention to sell or utilize the domain to divert plaintiff’s customers. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v 3M Co, the 11th Circuit found that the defendant had no “intention to profit” where the defendant indicated no intention to sell or utilize the domain to divert plaintiff’s customers. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v 3M Co, the 11th Circuit found that the defendant had no “intention to profit” where the defendant indicated no intention to sell or utilize the domain to divert plaintiff’s customers. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm by Schachtman
The American Public Health Association (APHA) is a significant organization ostensibly committed to the improvement of public health. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 6:18 am by David Jensen
California Stem Cell Report: Are there processes at CIRM that show weaknesses or need to be re-examined? [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am by Jay Yurkiw
Undue burden Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
See, e.g., Playboy Entm’t Group, Inc., 529 U.S. at 813 (citing Cohen in discussing how “content-based speech restriction[s]” aimed at offensive speech are treated). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:58 am
Three of the 2(e)(5) decisions were precedential: black floral packaging in In re Florists’ Transworld Delivery, Inc., 106 USPQ2d 1784 (TTAB 2013) [TTABlogged here]; peppermint flavor for nitroglycerin in In re Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. [read post]