Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Gravelet-Blondin 13-691Issue: (1) Whether it is – or should be – clearly established that police officers per se violate the United States Constitution when they use nontrivial force in the context of passive resistance, regardless of the surrounding circumstances; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit’s unique treatment of tasers – “intermediate force as a matter of law,” which “must” be justified by the government interest involved … [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:24 pm by Ben
 Speaking to the Trinidad Express, NCC chairman Allison Demas said her organisation, through attorneys, had written to the TTCO on the matter back in February 2013 but to date no response has been forthcoming. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:54 am by The Murray Law Firm
Cartilage was crossing Gray Highway at the Graham Road intersection just after 6:30pm when a dark colored truck hit him and fled the scene. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
The IPKat has received quite a few emails from readers wondering whether this blog will touch upon the matter. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:40 am by Paul J. Feldman
The FCC has now expressly acknowledged that the “the global multimedia communications infrastructure of the future” will consist of all-IP networks very different from the circuit-switched technology we have been used to since Alexander Graham Bell. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:30 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Gravelet-Blondin 13-691 Issue: (1) Whether it is – or should be – clearly established that police officers per se violate the United States Constitution when they use nontrivial force in the context of passive resistance, regardless of the surrounding circumstances; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit’s unique treatment of tasers – “intermediate force as a matter of law,” which “must” be justified by the government interest involved – is… [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
Put another way, the Federal Tort Claims Act divests this Court of subject matter jurisdiction over all claims that have not been presented in the first instance to the proper federal department. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:29 am by Jackie Hutter, IP Strategist
While a few years old, I recently discovered this article from lead author Stuart Graham, a Georgia Tech Business School professor who from 2010-2013 served as Chief Economist of the US Patent Office. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:29 am by Jackie Hutter, IP Strategist
While a few years old, I recently discovered this article from lead author Stuart Graham, a Georgia Tech Business School professor who from 2010-2013 served as Chief Economist of the US Patent Office. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:59 am by Guest Blogger
I included a 1959 article from the Canadian Bar Review by Professor Graham Murray of the Faculty of Law at Dalhousie University, entitled, “Evidence: A Fresh Approach The American Uniform Rules Of Evidence” (1959), 37 Can. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:15 am by Marian Ang, Olswang LLP
    [1] See Lord Hope’s judgment in McInnes v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 7, 2010 SC (UKSC) 28 [2]  R v Graham [1997] 1 Cr App R 302, 208 per Lord Bingham of Cornhill CJ [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 10:44 am by Mark Graber
  This defense of libertarianism was quite prominent in the works of such nineteenth century Jacksonians as William Leggett and, later, William Graham Sumner. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
Noting that the sons claim they did not find out about the matter until 2009, the appellate court allowed the suit to proceed on the grounds that it was not time-barred. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
People v Sorge established that the trial courts have broad discretion to keep the proceedings within manageable limits and to curtail exploration of collateral matters. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
He further testified, in contrast to the others, that he had promptly reported the matter to his grandmother, who, in turn, had reported the matter to his mother. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Mike Dawson, "Judge to consider whether Cynthia Baldwin represented Penn State or Graham Spanier in Sandusky case,"supra.But a functional approach  might suggest a more nuanced analysis. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1985) ("In a § 103 obviousness analysis, Graham [v. [read post]