Search for: "In the Matter of Faith A. F."
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2015, 7:45 am
As a matter of fact, the Court in the Mole case held, (“[I]f adverse action is taken against a satisfactorily performing employee in the immediate aftermath of the employer’s becoming aware of the employee’s protected activity, an inference of causation is permissible. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 7:45 am
As a matter of fact, the Court in the Mole case held, (“[I]f adverse action is taken against a satisfactorily performing employee in the immediate aftermath of the employer’s becoming aware of the employee’s protected activity, an inference of causation is permissible. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:19 am
Unsurprisingly, it is both cost effective and more effective as a security matter to hire third-party specialist to provide these services. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:36 am
Co., 961 F. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
This post examines a recent decision from the CaliforniaCourt of Appeals – First District: People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:55 pm
It is only a matter of time before the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
Lupu is the F. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
The entire series of transactions would take place in a matter of milliseconds. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:29 pm
The element of outrageous conduct is particularly susceptible to determination as a matter of law. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:45 am
Well f* * * that. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
In certain circumstances corporations can avoid, or minimize, criminal liability and massive financial penalties if they have have made good faith efforts to meet compliance standards, investigated indicators of criminal activity and disclosed certain information regarding misconduct to law enforcement and agency regulators. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
The court begins its opinion by explaining that[f]ive years ago we concluded that the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 [Revised Code of Washington], applied to a record stored on a personal computer, recognizing that `[i]f government employees could circumvent the PRA by using their home computers for government business, the PRA could be drastically undermined. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:20 pm
“Good faith efforts” no longer sufficient. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
The GDPR could then apply standard, well-tested procedural checks to limit erroneous or bad faith removals of lawful user-generated content. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:13 pm
Co., 498 F. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:37 am
The court went on to note that[f]ollowing the lead of the Supreme Court in Horton v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
In view of the passage of so much time, extensive discovery and the lack of notice to defendants of the additional transactions and occurrences (see CPLR 203 [f]), it would clearly be improvident to permit plaintiffs to expand their pleadings to add facts within their personal knowledge. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 5:39 pm
” In re Moore, 739 F.3d 724, 729–30 (5th Cir. 2014). [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 9:02 am
As an initial matter, it doesn’t have much to do with plain view. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The GDPR could then apply standard, well-tested procedural checks to limit erroneous or bad faith removals of lawful user-generated content. [read post]
