Search for: "J. C." Results 1121 - 1140 of 19,470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Côté J. would have dismissed the appeal, substantially for the reasons of the majority of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Safeguarding and the Church of England The C of E’s Independent Safeguarding Board is currently part of the structure of the National Church Institutions, with oversight from the Archbishops’ Council. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 10:59 am by Eugene Volokh
In a comprehensive written decision, the trial judge summarized the evidence and applied the best interests of the child factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Fisch (University of Pennsylvania), and Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley) , on Monday, April 24, 2023 Tags: Charter & bylaws, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Dual-class stock, IPOs, Shareholders A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court Posted by Adam C. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Fisch (University of Pennsylvania), and Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley) , on Monday, April 24, 2023 Tags: Charter & bylaws, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Dual-class stock, IPOs, Shareholders A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court Posted by Adam C. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Garry Jenkins (Dean, Minnesota; Google Scholar) & Jon J. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
April 19, 2023) (Op. by Mundy, J.), the court ruled that the removal of a vehicle from a multiple motor vehicle insurance policy, in which stacked coverage had been previously waived through a waiver form executed by the insured, did not require the insurance carrier to secure a renewed expressed waiver of stacked coverage under §1738(c).At the lower level, the Pennsylvania Superior Court had described the issue in this case as one of first impression. [read post]