Search for: "Jones v. Johns" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
HarrisDocket: 10-224Issue(s): (1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a “presumption against preemption” requires a “narrow interpretation” of the Federal Meat Inspection Act's express preemption provision, in conflict with this Court's decision in Jones v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Keith Tallon Cook Taylor Caroline Landes   McMillan Williams Helen MacDonald Aitken Associates Martin Wray Aitken Associates Kelly Wild   Aitken Associates Peter Harris Harris Temperley Caron Theobalds Harris Temperley Stewart Hughan Harris Temperley Nina Shaw  Harris Temperley Philip Wilkins  Hudgell & Partners Elizabeth Bendall Sternberg Reed Gordon Reed Sternberg Reed Darren Ward Sternberg Reed Jenny Morrison Morrison Spowart Karen Forrester Mackesys Caroline… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Justices Felix Frankfurter and John Marshall Harlan, who were very historically minded, opposed incorporation on that ground. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On 2 May 2018, Sir Geoffrey Vos heard an application in the case of Appleby v BBC. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Jones Docket: 09-357 Issue: When a state court has reviewed the merits of a petitioner’s federal claim for plain error, is the decision of a federal court of appeals in a habeas corpus action that there was procedural default of that claim contrary to the decisions of this Court? [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:08 am by New Books Script
KF 311 H67 2011 Outcomes-focused regulation / Andrew Hopper and Gregory Treverton-Jones. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Maryland and the third-party doctrine, particularly in light of Jones. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
Ashcroft (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 10-98). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Ritika Singh
In other news, the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]