Search for: "King v. United States Government"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
Static Control Components, in which it will consider who has the right to bring a false advertising claim under the federal Lanham Act; and United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
This Week, United States Supreme Court Rules DNA Tests Can Be Done On Innocent People Arrested – and Stored in National DNA Database On Monday, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 12:15 pm
King, a case that was then only pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:45 am
Static Control Components and United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:12 pm
The United States Supreme Court handed down somewhat of a shocking decision this week in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am
At JURIST, Eric Segall discusses Fisher in the context of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:39 pm
IRS Abuses Power in Targeting Tea Party The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Peter King (R-NY), who said the “FBI has to do a full and complete investigation, because this really is criminal in the literal sense of the word. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:02 am
He has that "right" under a United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), the defendant was unable to point to specific facts illustrating that the delay harmed his ability to defend himself adequately. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
They see dark images of civilian and military national security personnel in the basement of the White House – acting, as Senator Angus King put it, as “prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner” — going down a list of Americans, deciding for themselves who shall live and who shall die, pursuant to a process and by standards no one understands. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
In return, the United States protects the work of French authors in the United States.This means that the United States will protect a French author in the United States in the same manner and extent as the United States protects American authors. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Maryland v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 5:12 am
However, as I stated previously, ‘this administration has not carried out drone strikes inside the United States and has no intention of doing so. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
United States will address whether the federal government has sovereign immunity from lawsuits for intentional wrongful acts by prison guards acting as law enforcement officials. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
