Search for: "Mann v. Mann" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 3:53 am
OMH, Lambert claimed, (1) found her to be her eligible for FMLA benefits on February 1995 but (2) terminated her in March 1995.The court never reached the merits of Lambert’s allegations, holding that [s]ince Lambert’s FMLA claim against the Office of Mental Health is predicated on a request for leave involving her own health condition (in contrast, for example, to a request for leave for the birth of a child), it is barred by the Eleventh Amendment.The court cited Hale v… [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
In a statement, the estate's attorney Howard Weitzman said that"The Estate had hoped Mann would voluntarily cease his conduct but that was not to be. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:36 am by Ben Vernia
On December 27, 2010, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Mann v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:16 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal have listed the appeal which has been lodged by Glenn Mulcaire against the decision of Mr Justice Mann handed down on 17 November 2010 in Phillips v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:27 am by Kathryn McCann - Guest
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Milner v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm by almaraz
Sterne Roberta Mann Federal, State, and Local Climate Change Tax Policies: Coordination or Cross-Purpose? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:02 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Mann Act Sufficiency of the evidence Where the purpose of interstate travel was both to hold religious retreats and have sex with a minor, the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of having sex with a minor. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Mann of Gendler & Mann in Seattle for the petitioner. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
Back in December 2009, in the Patents Court for England and Wales, Mr Justice Mann gave a ruling in Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2009] EWHC 3164 (Ch), noted here by the IPKat. [read post]