Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 28,408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Cunniff’s report reflects that Mote passed along Hodgson’s information to others above him in the Army Reserve command structure, including Captain Jeremy Reamer. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
There is no originalism in the majority opinion except for passing references to quite general statements made by Hamilton and Madison. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:19 am by Frank Cranmer
In Tossici-Bolt & Anor v Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (Amendment Judgment) [2023] EWHC 3230 (Admin), handed down on the same day, the Court refused Christian Concern permission to add an additional ground to the judicial review claim: that the Order had been made without lawful authority because it was not passed according to the Council’s Constitution but, instead, decided upon unilaterally by a single Councillor. [read post]
A similar law was passed in Arizona in 2010 before being struck down in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[Defendant was "walking along the highway holding up signs to passing motorists stating 'PHUCK,' '#THIN BLUE,' and 'Slow Down Police Ahead.'"] State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Mockus for committing blasphemy during his lectures in State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
The recent case out of the Eastern District of Virginia federal court, Strata Solar LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am by Eric Goldman
Backpage * District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
The Committees had alleged that the defendant’s use of the name "OLYMPIC" amounted to passing off and claimed the sum of ₦2 billion as general, exemplary, and punitive damages for the unauthorised use, passing off, and infringement of "OLYMPIC" as well as the usage of their goodwill, integrity, and name without the required rights. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 pm by Amy Howe
” Illinois insisted that there was no reason for the Supreme Court to intervene now, both because no other federal appeals court has addressed these kinds of gun restrictions since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]