Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 1121 - 1140 of 39,625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2010, 12:07 pm
Times up for USPTO in Wyeth v Kappos Patent owners may also be celebrating this month with the recent decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that held that the USTPO had erred in calculating patent term adjustments for two patents owned by Wyeth and Elan Pharma International. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:39 pm
Not many people are going to get to the door within five seconds at 6:30 in the morning. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:56 am by Danny Jacobs
Supreme Court’s ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 7:01 am by Ezra Rosser
New Article: Elenore Wade, Extractive Welfare: Medicaid Statutory Recovery Formulas After Gallardo V. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:09 pm by Elliot Harmon
As Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Matel v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:20 am
  Even if the words QTIP and gross-up continue to mean something different to tax practitioners than they do to normal people. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm by Mike
 The bumble-fuck bullet catchers who could never afford slaves may have believed it. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm by Anthony Gaughan
The answer may simply be caution on Grassley’s  part. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
People have leveled a number of criticisms at this doctrine. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
In this vein, the recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) decision in Gitxaala Nation v Canada was heralded as a major legal victory for Indigenous peoples opposing the opposing the Enbridge pipelines and tankers proposal, and many hope that we are now on a pathway to put that risky project to rest for good. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  That may or may not be orthogonal to the liberal-conservative dimension, but it is certainly not the same. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
June 12th marks the anniversary of the US Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in the civil rights case Loving v. [read post]