Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 3,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
In another 5-4 decision from Justice Kennedy, the court said sellers who engage in significant business within a state may be required to pay taxes, even if the business does not have a physical presence in the taxing state. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:02 am
Jones Day v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Kirschner v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
April 30, 2009), a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied the United States Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:54 am
As soon as she told Marquez that she was not convicted of any crimes, Marquez had her sign a waiver, which states in pertinent part: Parties represent and state that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in documents for the above purchase, that [Hernandez Is irrevocably purchasing said store and waives condition of approval by the State of New York Liquor Authority and Beverage Control Board, and further states that he/she is qualified for an off-premises beer… [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:46 pm
Harrington v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:26 am
[when] the alteration could have been anticipated by the manufacturer or seller, or did not causally contribute to the damages or injuries complained of.'" Fleming v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:59 pm
Only if the seller had a store, warehouse, or even just a traveling salesman inside the state, can that seller be required to collect a sales tax on what it sells from afar. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:13 pm
Fredrick v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:49 am
To ensure that Natale’s participation did not violate New York State Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7(a), the “attorney-witness rule,” U.S. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:57 am
Brew 4U, LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
In State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Parcside Equity, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:32 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
., LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:05 pm
By Eric Goldman FPX, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:04 am
” Amaro v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
" State v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:58 pm
In addition, the structure of the agreements between Ingenico and VeriFone, the only two significant POS sellers in the United States post-merger, enhances VeriFone and Ingenico’s ability to coordinate pricing for all POS terminals.The complaint is U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:10 am
In Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. [read post]
