Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 3,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Hoffman v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:06 am
* Jazz Photo v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:13 am
The case is NRT New England, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:32 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
In another 5-4 decision from Justice Kennedy, the court said sellers who engage in significant business within a state may be required to pay taxes, even if the business does not have a physical presence in the taxing state. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:02 am
Jones Day v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
It was not just to prevent other sellers from using similar names (e.g. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Sellers v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:04 am
” Amaro v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:59 pm
Only if the seller had a store, warehouse, or even just a traveling salesman inside the state, can that seller be required to collect a sales tax on what it sells from afar. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 9:54 am
strikes and you're out - well, we told you so" campaign (see next) and the anti-child porn brigade, it has to be said that the ECD immunities of Art 13-15 - including the requirement that the state not ask ISPs or hosts to proactively monitor or filter in Art 15 - look increasingly like dead ducks.Things look to be going the same way in the US as well, with both the CDA s 230c immunity under fire in the US Tiffany litigation, and DMCA immunity attacked in the ongoing Viacom… [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
Addressed in the context of a marihuana (marijuana) sale, In People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:13 pm
Fredrick v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
., LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:46 pm
Harrington v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:10 am
In Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:54 am
As soon as she told Marquez that she was not convicted of any crimes, Marquez had her sign a waiver, which states in pertinent part: Parties represent and state that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in documents for the above purchase, that [Hernandez Is irrevocably purchasing said store and waives condition of approval by the State of New York Liquor Authority and Beverage Control Board, and further states that he/she is qualified for an off-premises beer… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:26 am
[when] the alteration could have been anticipated by the manufacturer or seller, or did not causally contribute to the damages or injuries complained of.'" Fleming v. [read post]
