Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 5,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 8:11 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaIn a case headed for the state's highest court, the Oregon Appeals Court has reinstated a $355,000 libel judgment against a church regarding allegations that a former pastor misappropriated church funds.Writing the majority opinion in Tim Tubra v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:17 am
Being at work is an essential job function Dickinson v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 5:15 am by Terry Hart
— The Authors Guild looks at last week’s Eleventh Circuit decision in Cambridge University Press v Albert, an ongoing dispute over Georgia State University’s use of copyrighted works through its digital coursepack system. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:10 am by On the Net
(v) A person who takes back a purchase money mortgage in connection with the sale of residential real estate. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:26 am by Terry Hart
In US, No Remedies for Growing IP Infringements — Sovereign immunity largely shields states and state entities from being liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
We think this view leads to a state of uncertainty and gives primacy to the rule of EU law over the national constitutional rule of law. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:41 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Upjohn Co., 890 S.W.2d 425, 434 (Tenn. 1994) (stating pharmacists have duty to exercise standard of care required of pharmacy profession in same or similar communities); Schaerrer v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
Levine suffered, but he utterly misses the point of this law suit, which was her right to bring the case against Wyeth in the state where she lived and the injury occurred and in which state the product was sold and administered, versus being forced to bring it in federal court under the shield of preemption. [read post]