Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 13,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2008, 9:18 pm
The case, Caperton v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:42 am
Additional Resources:Stacy M. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:31 am
The plaintiff in Beaton v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
Finally, as the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:59 pm
If you do, they'll be required to report you to the authorities, under penalty of losing their license and/or going to prison if they don't.Admittedly, in a 4-3 opinion, the California Supreme Court holds that it's possible that this statute might violate the state constitutional right to privacy, at least as applied to those patients who are getting treatment and aren't likely to do it again. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:04 pm
The problem is those pesky state usury laws. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
Here's a crime that doesn't fill up a plethora of pages in the California Appellate Reports: a state criminal prosecution of the owner of twelve Subway restaurants for underpaying state sales tax revenue.Notwithstanding the prosecution, white collar criminals everywhere should be happy at the underlying events. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
We agree that the evidence supports the state court's factual findings." [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:36 pm
In a related column in The Wall Street Journal’s Think Tank, Drew Altman examines the potential impact if the Supreme Court rules in favor of the plaintiffs in the King v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
After losing in the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 2:36 am
NOTE: In 2008 the Justice Policy Institute estimated what it would cost each state to implment AWA -v- What the state would lose for not implmenting AWA. 12-9-2009 National: The answer is simple, NO, states will not lose a dime for not enacting the provisions of AWA. [read post]
11 May 2013, 6:00 am
**In passing, Diamond v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:27 pm
Apotex v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:03 pm
South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
They can prove that they are losing money, but haven't been able to prove how. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 6:28 am
She did not lose consciousness during the ordeal. [read post]
