Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 1121 - 1140 of 36,625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
Adam Levitin already posted on this week's decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:53 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
United States Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Record on review Review under 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1) is limited to the record that was before the state court that adjudicated the claim on the merits. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
So consider last year's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
This decision marks the latest action in the ongoing efforts by EPA and states to regulate greenhouse gas emissions; particularly in terms of carbon emissions from currently existing power plants. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
I suppose that the extra displacement aspect of the statute would make that statute a somewhat heavier political lift, but if the Republicans can get rid of Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In addition, an arbitration award may be vacated pursuant to CPLR §7511(b)(1)(iii) where "an arbitrator . . . exceeded his or her power," which includes those circumstances in which the award "violates strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Biersdorf & Associates
As stated in a previous article, the only entity that intrinsically holds the power of eminent domain is the state. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by ernst
That judgment, now nearly two centuries old, is Judge Thomas Ruffin’s infamous opinion for the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:04 am by WIMS
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:39 am by Nick Dranias
The goal of the Compact for America (“CFA”) initiative is for the states to propose and ratify the powerful balanced budget amendment that is contained in the Compact for a Balanced Budget into the United States Constitution in as little as one session year, with a target of July 4, 2017, and a “do or die” date of April […] [read post]