Search for: "State v. Vanness" Results 1121 - 1140 of 3,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 3:04 am by Walter Olson
” Two views of the recent case Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The US State Department is to collect via applicants’ social media information for tracking and security purposes – the Social Media Law Bulletin has coverage. [read post]
18 May 2018, 11:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.htmlAlvin Van Pelt III v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The authors of this article are both attorneys-at-law at Kennedy Van der Laan in Amsterdam, and have acted on behalf of the Dutch media in the court case against the EU discussed in this article. [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting case about libel and science; I will quote from the magistrate's report and recommendations in Santilli v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
    The Red Sole 2: Szpunar’s backChristian Louboutin v Van Haren Case C‑163/16 (February 2018)I debated whether or not to include this – Advocate General opinions aren’t the final word, and the CJEU does not always follow them. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer, Ashley Deeks
… Are there concerns that an individual's mental state might exacerbate risk? [read post]
3 May 2018, 6:23 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In a 2000, El Paso Court of Appeals opinion styled, State & County Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Hayley Evans
District Court for the District of Columbia’s opinion in Doe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Cornell’s preview is by Axel Schamis and Katherine Van Bramer. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:30 am by William Ford
Scott Harman summarized the proceedings in Doe v. [read post]