Search for: "U.S. v. Gates"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 4:39 pm
The plaintiff shareholder attempted to argue, in reliance on the First Circuit’s 1996 decision in Shaw v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:39 pm
The plaintiff shareholder attempted to argue, in reliance on the First Circuit’s 1996 decision in Shaw v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm
In Peter v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am
Tillis's efforts to distance himself from (at least) the proposed overruling of the eBay v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Garrison Architects v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Medrick v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am
My blog posts yesterday about the limitations of Apple's ability to lay exclusive claim to modern-day computing technologies -- "10 European judges found Apple had not invented slide-to-unlock (star patent at Samsung trial)" and "In 49 months of holy war, Apple has not proved that it owns any feature other than rubber-banding" -- have already been read widely and they have sparked some debate.All in all, I'm very happy about the reactions I received (and 10% of moronic emails don't matter). [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
Raimondo decision overruled Chevron v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
The U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
In other words, the lawyers in the NSMC case had a duty to guard the gate and they failed to do so. 1980s: The S&L Cases Stanley Sporkin would once again encounter the gatekeeper issue some 15 years after his victory in the NSMC case, this time from the other side of the fence, after he had moved on from SEC enforcement division director to become a U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
However, in Garland, Justice Cullity accepts that there is a chance for an appearance of conflict of interest that could arise if such compensation were to be awarded routinely.[30] However, because the test was set strictly, the judicial discretion to award compensation in a Cy-près in distribution Garland would not open the flood gates of conflict of interest amongst class members. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 9:00 pm
In Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Barbarians at the Gate (or Within?) [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
The Supreme Court has long emphasized, as it explained in Flast v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
There's a new draft of the ALI's Principles of Aggregate Litigation in circulation. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
Legal Risks Under International Privacy Laws – bit.ly/JyhIRp (Sheldon, Mark & Anderson) Cyber-Threat Cooperation Emerging Between U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
