Search for: "US LEGALIZATION INC." Results 1121 - 1140 of 29,582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 8:49 am by WIMS
(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:54 am by WIMS
Additional information from The Legal ExaminerWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Avianca, Inc., No. 22-cv-1461 (PKC), 2023 WL 3966209, at *1-2 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:24 pm by James Peters
Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc., S138130, today and I have to say I am disappointed with the opinion, although I think the dissenting opinion was completely on the mark.The DecisionThe Court decided that employers can terminate employees in California who use medical marijuana with a doctor's prescription for a valid medical reason and not be held liable for doing so under state employment discrimination laws.The majority spent almost all of their opinion talking about how… [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 11:14 am by Administrator
THE OWNERS, STRATA PLAN BCS 3699 v. 299 BURRARD DEVELOPMENT INC. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 3:38 am
Multronics, Inc., 461 F.2d 836, 174 USPQ 107, 110-11 (CCPA 1972); Daybrook-Ottawa Corp. v. [read post]
The post US Supreme Court hears oral arguments in cases involving Renewable Fuel Standards Program and noncitizen re-entry appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Board decision in MINISTRY OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, TRINIDAD, W.I. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:19 pm by Rob Robinson
Press Release ModeOne Technologies Awarded New US Patent for Remote, Automated Collection of Data from Smartphones Patent Announcement – Financial Market News Funding Announcement – Law.com ModeOne Technologies, Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Kari D. Boyle
This will help us to better understand whether unbundling is meeting the needs of clients and legal professionals AND what needs to change to make it work better. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:22 am
"Mistake: "'Misidentified through mistake,' as used in Trademark Rule 2.102(b), means a mistake in the form of the potential opposer's name or its entity type, not the naming of a different existing legal entity that is not in privity with the party that should have been named. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by marcie_baranich
This makes it useful for those researching more general or regional constitutional topics. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]