Search for: "United States v. Li" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Executive Power After United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:09 am by Angela Mauroni
United States Railroad Retirement Board, entails the request by Salinas to reopen the denial of his disability annuity application based on the Railroad Retirement Act. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
Ultimately, United States District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker did not refer the matter for discipline, but the fact that a District Court Judge pondered the idea is interesting, to say the least. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am by David Post
" But the Agreement goes on to state that these names are "pseudonyms whose true identity [is] acknowledged in a Side Letter. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am by Guest Blogger
  The degendering of marriage has not been attacked as a violation of the United States constitution because we understand that the marriages the states sanction today are marriage and give what is required by the Constitution (whatever that is, about which the courts have not said much). [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
United States oral argument reminded me of how little the Roberts Court has actually cared about rule of law values and legal transparency during its 18-year run. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 7:24 am
Three recent films - Children of Men, V for Vendetta, and Minority Report - sound a warning call by painting stark and contrasting visions of life in the United States and Great Britain in the 21st century. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 The most difficult question that confronts the historian who considers these issues, though, lies in making a normative judgement about state protests against federal law. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Although the CUSMA does not provide investor-state arbitration provisions as between Canada and the United States with respect to investment protection, the key investment obligations remain in place on a state-to-state basis. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:29 am
The decision on whether to admit the information lies at the discretion of the court. . . . [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Then again, the SCOTUS could always review it to see if the opinion violates the Admission Act or the United States Constitution. [read post]