Search for: "United States v. Rogers"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm
Last updated: 10.24.16 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:12 am
A Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) unit was ordered by a South Carolina judge to pay more than $327 million in penalties for deceptively marketing the antipsychotic drug Risperdal as safer and better than competing medicines.J&J’s Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals unit repeatedly violated the state’s consumer-protection laws by sending a 2003 letter to doctors touting Risperdal as superior to rival drugs and including deceptive information in the… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:25 am
For one thing, Greg delves deeply into the Canadian government's treatment of Japanese Canadians in British Columbia; the comparison of the Canadian experience with the simultaneous experience in the United States is fascinating (not to mention long overdue -- the most recent noteworthy comparative effort being Roger Daniels's nearly thirty-year-old Concentration Camps North America). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am
Circuit released its opinion in Al Bihani v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
(IP finance) United Kingdom Digital Economy Act emerges from judicial review largely unscathed (IP Osgoode) (Out Law) P2P lawyer fined after £5.99 web host falls to Anonymous attacks (ArsTechnica) Small application, streamlined track: copyright licences hit the fast lane (IPKat) United States US General The PROTECT-IP Act: COICA redux (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Technology Liberation Front) (Copyright… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
(See also this report by the New York Times, stating that frustration along these same lines contributed to the effort to get President Obama to remove Admiral Rogers in late 2016.) [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court to brief and argue Collins v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
, (May 25, 2008).Frederick Mark Gedicks, Fundamentalism, Spirituality, and Church-State Relations in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Casenotes: state. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 10:40 am
In the 2010 Supreme Court of British Columbia case of CMIC Mortgage Investment Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:22 pm
Rock, of Boston, as a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm
Roger Cleveland v Prince Judgment(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js? [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Rogers Smith once asserted that commitments to liberalism were a constant feature of American constitutional politics. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Opinion below (Supreme Court of North Carolina) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Honorable Vernon Sykes and Honorable Roger Corbin (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the League of Women Voters of the United States (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, and Ohio (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the NAACP, Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior, and Mary Jordan (in support of the… [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
United States and the implications of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari. [read post]
