Search for: "Appeal of Hughes"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2015, 7:13 pm
” Judge Hughes penned the opinion that was joined by the two other panel members, Judges Reyna and Schall. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
If this is an obviousness case under 103, then one wonders about the textConsistent with In re Hughes, 345 F.2d 184 (CCPA 1965) (if areference is subject to two interpretations, then it will not support ananticipation rejection), we are unable to find that “a fumaric acid ester” asdescribed by Kappos is DMF or MMF. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In late July, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“the court”), the final appeals court for global sports, suspended the practice of “hyperandrogenism regulation” by the International Association of Athletics Federations (“the I.A.A.F. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:25 am
According to the Times, Rice requested that Pakistan crack down more effectively on the militant Haqqani network especially---a particularly pointed appeal in the wake of reports that Pakistan may lose a significant amount of U.S. military aid over its failure to quash the network’s activities. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
On 18 February 2014, the Court of Appeal (Elias, Lewison and Floyd LJJ) allowed the appeal. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 4:56 am
"But the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed Hughes last May, saying Polanco was not "disabled" until after he was fired, so based on the plain language exception found in Section 3600(a)(l0)(D) his claim could not be summarily dismissed.The exception in Section 3600(a)(l0)(D) is, "The date of injury, as specified in Section 5412, is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
Appeal allowed. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:46 am
Hughes, 517 F.3d 1013 (U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes agreed with Lady Hale. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in Huff v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:12 pm
– Hugh Tomlinson QC Defamation Act 2013: Does section 1 replace the test of the hypothetical reasonable reader by that of the twitter troll? [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Fifth Court of Appeals addresses complex issues in appeal from summary judgment in suit by tort clients who sued their lawyers for barratry CARL "STACEY" NEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.N., C.N., L.N., AND C.N., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Dallas Court of Appeals addresses complex issues in appeal from summary judgment in suit by tort clients who sued their lawyers for barratry CARL "STACEY" NEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.N., C.N., L.N., AND C.N., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:14 pm
Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench News: Tulisa “Sex Tape”, false privacy turns into true privacy The Perils of “Revenge Porn” – Alex Cochrane La Regina Nuda and Italian Privacy Law – Athalie Matthews and Giacomo Parmigiani Case Law: Růžový Panter, OS v Czech Republic: Anti-Corruption… [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
In the case of Lachaux v Independent Print ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)) Warby J gave judgement on preliminary issues including in relation to “serious harm” in a number of libel actions brought against three newspapers and the Huffington Post. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 5:13 am
In One Call Property Services, Inc., a/a/o William Hughes v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:53 am
Well, here are four appeals that were decided this month. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 12:34 pm
IRS appealed and the matter is currently pending in the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
In the case of Niemela v Google (2015 BCSC 1024) the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed a claim for a worldwide interim libel injunction against Google by a Vancouver lawyer who had been subject to online abuse by someone he alleged to have been a former client and entered summary judgment for Google. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
The Court of Appeal found that Birss J's analysis of the prior art and his reliance on the expert evidence was factually and legally sound and affirmed the High Court decision.Perhaps more interesting is that the patent has fared differently in litigation in different jurisdictions; the Court of Appeal in Canada rejected an appeal from the judgment of Mr Justice Hughes who had found the patent obvious over the same prior art before Birss J (first… [read post]
