Search for: "Bad v. Smith" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2016, 11:23 am by John Floyd
Supreme Court passed on an opportunity to settle this tension in early 2012, when it avoided the question in Smith v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:22 am
We mean, if it had been Smith, or Jones, maybe it was a coincidence - but not Prohias. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 12:16 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Smith, 806 N.E.2d 727, 730 (Ill. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Some of these insulating statutes are “mandatory,” such as Florida’s statute, which automatically limits directors’ liability to breaches of duty that were, inter alia, reckless or in bad faith.[12]  Other states, such as California, have “permissive” insulating statutes, which only apply if the corporation includes an exculpatory clause in its Articles of Incorporation.[13]  Insulating statutes, whether mandatory or permissive, typically… [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In a timeline of self-execution, comes after Missouri v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Because it was "early" in the litigation (the defendant had raised preemption on a motion to dismiss - usually a bad move), there was "no reason. . .to preclude altogether claims that invoked common law duties that appeared to be "‘equal to, or substantially identical to, requirements imposed' under federal law. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
I mean, other than the base-2 rendering of the age at which drinking Jäger Bombs stops being illegal and becomes merely a bad idea. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
While Courts rarely interfere in bad contracts they may do so when the contract is void as against public policy or is unconscionable. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:37 am by SHG
From the perspective of a police officer, as the law requires the shooting be considered under Graham v. [read post]