Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
R (Guardian News and Media) v City of Westminster Magistrates [2010] EWHC 3376 (Admin) – 21 December 2010, Admin Court (Sullivan LJ and Silber J). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the decision comes from Dan Sullivan and others in the Tampa Bay Times; commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Research & resources Jonathan Baines, Information Rights and Wrongs: Courts, Contempt and Data Protection POLIS blog, Pharma online: does regulation or corporate social media policy need to change to allow a real dialogue about medicines? [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am by Steve Hall
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]