Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 13,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 4:50 am
September 29, 2010) [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:46 pm
LEXIS 92 (March 29, 2007) [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:16 am
Vazquez, 555 F.3d 923, 928-29 (10th Cir. 2009), and can ask questions on any subject so long as the questioning does not prolong the detention beyond what is otherwise necessary to perform such routine tasks as computer checks and preparing reports and citations, see Karam, 496 F.3d at 1161. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
March 29, 2007).* Officer had cause to stop the plaintiff for a minor traffic violation and then arrest for DUI. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:12 am
Comment: This case does not even cite Simmons that a defendant's testimony at a suppression hearing cannot be used at the trial unless the defendant testifies contrary to it. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Super., filed July 29, 2010), and KeyCorp, see King v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 8:13 am
First, the bill does not define “non-technological. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
Does it break the law? [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
” On July 29, 2020, a divided, 2-1 panel in the Sixth Circuit issued its opinion in Allan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Mar 29, 2010) (No. 1:09-CV-200-JVB). [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:06 pm
Wife does not take this well. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 2:27 pm
Defendants' joint motion to suppress the cell phone searches (Docs. 29 and 30) is moot. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:33 am
Just two months before the effective date (January 1, 2023) of the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) Board met on October 28 and 29 to discuss revisions to the agency’s initial draft CPRA regulations. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:10 pm
Families Against Mandatory Minimums reports that the House Judiciary Committee approved H.R. 3245 by a 16-9 vote on July 29, 2009. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run on June 1, 2008:
Sorted by Chapter Law Number. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
” Several court have thus interpreted the current rule in a way that does not result in automatic production of all statistical analyses performed, but only those data and analyses the witness has decided to present at trial. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:35 pm
July 29, 2011), read opinion here. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Is it just me, or does it seem ridiculous beyond words that August is about to expire? [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:33 am
Defendants objected on three grounds, (1) Mr. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:47 am
The Department of Labor’s third party employer regulation, 29 C.F.R. [read post]
