Search for: "Does 1 - 64" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm by Andrew Frisch
Doe, 488 F.3d 1154, 1155 n. 1 (9th Cir.2007) (allowing defendant convicted of producing child pornography to use pseudonym); Doe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am by Susan Brenner
Rather, under the narrow view of retail consent found in Davis, a customer has implied consent to take items from the shelf only if he or she does so with honest intent. . . . [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  In each case, from 64-74% of participants chose “very different” or “somewhat different. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:54 pm
Does not address structured settlements or any other settlement planning products; Does not address the secondary structured settlement market; Consists of three components: 1) losses paid to third parties; 2) defense costs; and 3) administrative expenses. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:07 pm by Dan Flynn
  The agency does not favor public notification in all instances, only when time remains to make vaccinating restaurant employees or customers worthwhile. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Then benchers could perform as does a government’s Cabinet ministers, and no longer have to be its civil service as well. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  FDA also found that marijuana meets the following three criteria for placing a substance in Schedule III under 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(3): 1. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In the present case, the debit order does not explicitly refer to any decision, nor does it contain a request defining the subject of the appeal. [read post]