Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 5:18 pm
Does Inequality Harm the Middle Class? [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
It does not matter all that much that as law, or legal practice, either the lawsuit or the Senate Bill are laughable. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
In addition, he noted that a job that does not require English proficiency, and an employer that accommodates both Spanish and Vietnamese speakers, is attractive to speakers of those languages. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 12:04 am
When does a person or organization have enough legal interest in an issue such that it can be a plaintiff in lawsuit? [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 12:04 am
When does a person or organization have enough legal interest in an issue such that it can be a plaintiff in lawsuit? [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 7:01 pm
§ 102(a)(1). [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:14 am
Leonard, 104 Ohio St.3d 54, 818 N.E.2d 229 (Ohio Supreme Court 2004) (quoting State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm
This scenario does not apply to nonsignatories. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
¶54.BSMG therefore allows, but does not make mandatory (the language is “is possible”/”may be”) the collective determination of defe [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
Nor does D1 give any disclosure or suggestion for a method for concluding the presence of a mechanical bond and appears to deal with a different ultrasonic parameter than that of the subject claims. [1.2.1] Claim 1 of this set of claims reads as follows (amendments as compared to claim 1 as originally filed are in bold; emphasis added by the Board): 1. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Before Justices Lang and Brown[1]. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Before Justices Lang and Brown[1]. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
See In re Jordan, 313 B.R. at 256 (quoting In re Lazaro, 128 B.R. at 168, 172-74, which in turn quotes In re Boeckman, 54 B.R. at 111: “[T]he permissive language used in Section 1412 . . . merely says that a district court ‘may’ transfer a case to another district; it does not say it must transfer the case . . . . [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:40 pm
" Finally, the court assumed that the parties would seek to take advantage of the preclusive effect of a judgment in the state action should it conclude first, and noted, "this is an expensive place to litigate, and the loser is subjecting itself to the winning party's costs pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
” In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 753–54 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
” In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 753–54 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
The letter does not conclusively establish a defense to this action. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:37 pm
Subject-matter contained in claims proposing the use of data processing devices, and possibly also encompassing non-technical instructions, requires a differentiated treatment which depends on the evaluation of whether an “invention” exists in a technical field within the meaning of § 1 PatG or of Art. 52 EPC, or whether the invention is new and based on inventive activity ( §§ 3, 4 PatG or Art. 53, 54 EPC). [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:52 pm
Some followups: 1. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 4:19 am
The criminal complaint, filed under seal on February. 1 in federal court in New York, was made public as Washington prepares to present Israel and Hamas a final hostage and ceasefire proposal. [read post]
