Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 7,356
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am
There are countless old court decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada available on its marvellous website in English only, if that is how they were originally released. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Colucci v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm
The 25-minute videos—available in English and Spanish—explain how protesters and legal observers can identify various police surveillance technologies, like body-worn cameras, drones, and automated license plate readers. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The big factors were (1) the case involves a claim for a tort committed in England; (2) that claim was probably governed by English law; (3) the passing off evidence would focus on consumers in England; (4) the governing law for the contract claims is state of Pennsylvania. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:16 pm
& Loan Assoc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:57 pm
Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd [1993] UKHL 18 established that the government cannot sue for libel. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 2:22 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 5:29 am
ZTE guidance after the Federal Court of Justice of Germany vitiated the ECJ case law in two Sisvel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:32 am
Referee Sunshine stated: “The court notes that throughout the hearing, Guliyev answered the questions in English before they were translated to him in Turkish finding that he understands the English language very well. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
It does not state that “Quebec is a nation”. [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:47 am
This means that in Nigeria we should not blindly follow English common law rules. [read post]
31 May 2021, 3:58 am
Porsche A.G. v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
; R. v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 2:36 pm
The panel’s decision in Hunstein v. [read post]
Foreign Judgments: The Limits of Transnational Issue Estoppel, Reciprocity, and Transnational Comity
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm
A distinctive feature of Singapore law on issue estoppel is the rejection of the broadly worded “special circumstances” exception to issue in English common law (Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93). [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:09 pm
Ct. 1659 (2013), as well as Lubbe v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:22 pm
And then there was Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
26 May 2021, 12:12 pm
The Rechtbank Den Haag, by judgment of 26 March 2021 – Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:00 am
She stated that, “[a] remedy in the nature of habeas corpus [had] long since been impossible to grant in this matter” (at para 9). [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:31 am
(See in English below)Estimadxs colegas,Con gran entusiasmo queremos compartirles la publicación del número 18 de Revista Derechos en Acción (ReDeA), dedicado especialmente a analizar los vínculos entre el accionar del FMI y los derechos humanos. [read post]
