Search for: "Fair v. State" Results 1141 - 1160 of 27,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Michael Geist
In fact, the unanimous court made it clear it disagreed with the analysis, stating “there are some significant jurisprudential problems with those aspects of their judgments that warrant comment. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Tweet Tags: racial preferences, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme CourtSchuette v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:39 am
The contention that the free standing Fourth Amendment claim was decided wrongly by state courts is barred under Stone v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
These distinctions, however, were not as rigid and laissez faire-oriented as depicted by conventional history. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm by Florian Mueller
Oracle's appellate counsel stated at the hearing that they disagreed with the jury instructions but decided to focus on copyrightability and, with respect to fair use, wanted a judgment as a matter of law (JMOL). [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 10:50 am
Ninth Circuit rejects amicus brief from Amazon.com, et al. on rehearing en banc in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  This is the question presented according to the cert. petition: Whether a state's parens patriae action is removable as a "mass action" under the Class Action Fairness Act when the state is the sole plaintiff, the claims arise under state law, and the state attorney general possesses statutory and common-law authority to assert all claims in the complaint. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:30 pm by Ronald Mann
Little noticed before the graceful display of collegial disagreement in the announcements of McCutcheon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:52 pm
TALLAHASSEE Florida high court weighs fairness, secrecy of death penalty The state Supreme Court is considering the fairness of both the lethal injection process and of keeping secret the identities of officials who carry out the process. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am by Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman
We think its fair import is that any appointee exercising significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States is an “Officer of the United States,” and must, therefore, be appointed in the manner prescribed by § 2, cl. 2, of that Article. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:29 pm by Schachtman
And Judge Chamberlain Haller, who presided over State v. [read post]