Search for: "Fee v. United States" Results 1141 - 1160 of 6,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2025, 2:02 pm by NARF
(Attorney Fee Agreement; Administrative Procedures Act (APA); Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)) United States, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am by Ron Pollock
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Microsoft at the CAFC: Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC, appeals a United States District Court for the District of Delaware order awarding costs under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
 And that's what I conveyed in the letter to the United States Attorney, that that was where our concern was coming from. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:39 am by Ann Caresani
Someone has to pay the legal fees for those choices, just like someone has to pay for the surprising punitive penalty in Rochow v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:42 am by aschwartz
 The court noted that “[s]occer has a smaller fan and financial base in the United States than, baseball. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 365 U.S. 265, 284-288 (1961), such a dismissal does not preclude the EEOC from returning to court after the pre-condition has been met. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:34 am by Larry
However, in these cases, in the absence of any information from the defendant indicating a reason to mitigate the penalty or duty collection, the Court issued judgment in favor of the United States at the amounts asserted. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:37 am by Bonny Rafel
On November 27, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in the matter of U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.htmlPetition for certiorari was filed in one case on 6/19/20:United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:04 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
–  The United States Supreme Court has ruled to affirm the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s decision against the Petitioner, Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. [read post]