Search for: "Glass v. Glass" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2015, 1:53 am by admin2
The observation of my cynical opossum friend (a vegetarian) is once again apt: look into the mirror and you will see “we have met the (plague) and it is usHe was eccentric, gifted, free and brilliantTo be sure, those stories and ballads made our captain to be a most wicked, profane wretch; and if he were, why, God knows he suffered and paid for it, for he laid his bones in Jamaica, and never saw his home or his wife and daughter again after he had sailed away on the Royal Sovereign on that… [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
BLM’s 1998 decision to continue the 26 unproven leases in the Glass Mountain Unit under § 1005(a) was issued simultaneously with its decision to reverse and vacate its earlier decision to extend those leases on a lease-by-lease basis under § 1005(g). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
In the Jneid case in Western Australia the court held that a front page of The West Australian, displayed in a glass box, was a separate publication. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 2:53 pm by familoo
In truth, based on my track record of never being able to stop talking or writing, this is unlikely but both barristers and writers are predisposed to angst so this is par for the course… Far more importantly on legal aid is IS v The Director of Legal Aid Casework & Anor [2015] EWHC 1965 (Admin) (15 July 2015), a humdinger of a judgment from Collins J basically trashing the whole exceptional funding scheme under s10 LASPO 2012. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 3:45 am by Broc Romanek
Apparently, wearable computers were all the rage during this year’s SXSW despite the demise of Google Glasses. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:47 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Readers of the IPKat blog may remember that Lindsay Lohan tried last year to convince a New York court that a video game had infringed her rights to publicity when depicting a blonde woman making the “V” sign, as Ms. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:18 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Thus, holding that the Arizona Constitution affords greater protections in some circumstances citing Arizona v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
This paper first considers the facts of R v Taylor and discusses the decisions of the trial court, the Alberta Court of Appeal, and the SCC. [read post]