Search for: "Microsoft v. United States" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 1:27 pm by Glenn
Even before the landmark United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:38 am
(1709 Copyright Blog)   Nigeria Updates on battling copyright piracy in Nigeria (Afro-IP)   South Korea Crazy copyright law set to cause chaos in South Korea (TorrentFreak)   Sweden New owners of Pirate Bay, Global Gaming Factory X, to adopt ‘give and take’ payment models (1709 Copyright Blog)   United Kingdom Microsoft tops Superbrands survey (IPKat) EWHC (Comm) ruling on transmission royalties in Excelsior Group Productions… [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:07 pm by Marie Louise
KPN (EPLAW)     Portugal Movie rental outfit calls for nationwide Pirate Bay block (TorrentFreak)   Somali Somali domains up for grabs (Afro-IP)   Sweden Filmmaker premieres movie in theaters and on The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Senior Judge warns of end to file-sharing cash demands (TorrentFreak) Prison sentence for camming – a UK first (Innovationpartners) (1709 Blog)   United States US Patents – Decisions… [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm by Florian Mueller
In this regard, they've made concessions lately--concession that in my view don't go far enough to address competition concerns, but which nevertheless represent (limited) progress.On June 10, 2022, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California formally approved (PDF) a class-action settlement between small app developers and Apple. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:21 am by Ben Sperry
There are no laws against false speech in general, nor can there be, since the Supreme Court declared such speech was protected in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 1:43 am by Florian Mueller
Apple is fighting a strategic battle at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Microsoft Corp., No. 15-538 OIP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hawaii congresswoman and Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillary Clinton for defamation, alleging the 2016 nominee described her as a “Russian asset” and claiming more than $50m in damages. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which a commercial fisherman was prosecuted under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized fish, and the amicus brief that Cato filed in the case. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
United States Racquetball Association allowed a 1202 claim to proceed to trial based on garden variety infringement of a photograph. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
”  With few exceptions, the first 200-odd years of Privacy in the Unites States primarily concerned contexts where the identifiable nature of the data in question was not seriously in doubt. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]