Search for: "People v. Friday" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued orders from last Friday’s conference. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices issued orders from Friday’s conference, adding four cases to their merits docket for next term. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:39 am by Amy Howe
The justices have not yet issued their decision in that case, United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 pm by Amy Howe
” However, in this case, Alito stressed, Chuang “saw the pandemic as a ground for expanding the abortion right recognized in Roe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 pm by Mitch Stoltz
On Friday, the major US movie studios quietly backed away from the worst parts of the censorship power-grab they attempted in July in the Paramount v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
  In Ostrander v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 8:00 am by Amy Howe
The justices’ next conference is scheduled for Friday, Oct. 28. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:06 am by Steve Hall
In a statement on Friday, President Obama called Mr. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:48 am by Bill Marler
Case number is V 14-1029-1 in the Circuit Court of Benton County, Arkansas, Civil Division. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm by Prof. Rick Sander, guest-blogging
A further insult was that the paper had been included in an amicus brief submitted by opponents of affirmative action urging the Supreme Court to hear [Fisher v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am by Frank Cranmer
In England and Wales, the estimated number of people testing positive equated to around 1 in 40 people; in Northern Ireland, the figure was 1 in 50; and in Scotland, it was around 1 in 30. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am by Robert Brammer
In 1868, the Court of Common Pleas heard the case of Chorlton v Lings where, as was feared by some MPs, it was argued that the Interpretation Act 1850 provided the term “man” in the Representation of the People Act 1867 “shall be deemed and taken to include females … unless the contrary is expressly provided” and meant that women who otherwise met the eligibility requirements could vote. [read post]