Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 8:32 am
She would go further and uphold the mandate under the Commerce Clause, which Roberts wouldn't. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:28 am
They expected another Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
Bailey v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:56 am
There is an Opinion of the Court today in the Health Care Cases (National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:53 am
" "The individual mandate cannot be upheld as an exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause," Roberts wrote. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Nat'l Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
The decisive opinion by Justice Roberts reasons that the mandate was not authorized by commerce clause, but instead upheld the mandate as a tax. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
See Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:47 am
I heard a well-placed but completely unconfirmed rumor that Chief Justice Roberts is writing the majority opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
"Lochnerians" is a reference to the much-maligned 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Reproduced with permission from Electronic Commerce & Law Report, (June 13, 2012). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
” As readers of this Blog are aware, the critical question in Christopher v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
Dep't of Commerce. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:19 am
Law will be commerce. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am
John Fund v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Law will be commerce. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:08 pm
In Estate of Robert Graham et al v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
In Gibbons v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:01 am
(Randy Barnett) On TNR.com, Jeff Rosen has a thoughtful response to the criticism engendered by his New Republic magazine essay on Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
