Search for: "Richard Doeing" Results 1141 - 1160 of 14,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The following is a more detailed analysis by my partner, Richard (Rick) Josepher: WHAT DOES ZWERNER CASE MEAN TO PRACTITIONERS AND TO TAXPAYERS CONSIDERING MAKING VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES OF OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS WHERE PENALTIES ARE NOT DETERMINED UNDER FORMAL OFFSHORE DISCLOSURE PROGRAMS? [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
The struggle, which took place in December of 2007, involved Richard Renschler Jr. and Thomas W. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Washington does not care how much anything costs. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
  Such a holding does not appear warranted by existing California case law. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Doe, 2019 FC 214 is a reiteration and affirmation of the landmark ruling by Judge von Finckenstein in the first of these Canadian copyright “Doe” cases 14 years ago. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:54 am by Jim Harper
Wired’s Ryan Singel has given a read to Cyberwar, the new cybersecurity book by Richard Clarke and Robert Knake. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 10:00 pm by Ezra Rosser
Glogower, David Gamage, & Kitty Richards, Why a Federal Wealth Tax Is Constitutional, Roosevelt Inst. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Disclose Disclose Disclose: APJ Richard Lebovitz argues (on his own) that scientific researchers should be required to disclose potential patent rights prior to publication of related research as part of the conflict-of-interest review. [6 Nw. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
Yet the report does not adequately take into account any safety measures and does not thoroughly examine any of the reliability aspects of the various human space flight vehicle options considered. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:01 pm by Rick Klau
Will see what that does for me, and will circle back once I've knocked around a bit. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 5:38 am by Sharon L. Lippett and Daniel J. Green
Richards concerned state law claims raised by certain creditors against former Appvion executives alleging that the executives fraudulently inflated the value of Appvion stock in the years leading up to the bankruptcy. [read post]