Search for: "Ross v. State" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ross, 814 F.3d 520, 527–28 (1st Cir. 2016) (Souter, J., sitting by designation). [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
 at 536.]Apropos here, "[c]ross motions for summary judgment do not preclude the existence of issues of fact." [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Ross, a Dormant Commerce Clause challenge to California's law barring in-state sale of animal products that fail to meet California's regulatory requirements. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am by John Elwood
Ross, involving a dormant commerce clause challenge to a California law prohibiting the sale of pork unless the pigs from which it was made (virtually all of which come from outside the state) were raised consistent with the state’s restrictive standards. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
The last one-time relist to get a grant was Ross v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm by K&L Gates
Ross–Holst: To be sure, anything that a person says or does might in some theoretical sense be reflective of her emotional state. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
AG Capital Funding Partners, LP v State Street Bank and Trust Co, 11 NY3d 146, 866 NYS2d 578, 896 NE2d 91 (2008). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am by John Elwood
Ross, 21-468Issues: (1) Whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an integrated nationwide industry state a violation of the dormant commerce clause, or whether the extraterritoriality principle described in the Supreme Court’s decisions is now a dead letter; and (2) whether such allegations, concerning a law that is based solely on preferences regarding… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am by Justin Walsh
Blake State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 1 – Corinne Tobeck State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 2 – Uncontested State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 1 – Mary Helen Roberts State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 2 – Marko Liias State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 1 – Steve Robinson State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 2 – Sam Hunt / Chris Reykdal State Representative Dist. 23, Pos. 1 – Sherry… [read post]