Search for: "State v. Bail" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 1:11 pm by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
The 8th amendment to the United States Constitution states "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
  To avoid extradition where a requesting state is not “trial ready,” the Panel suggests postponing surrender and placing the requested person on bail in the executing State until the presence of the defendant is required. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:40 am by admin
District Court for the Southern District of New York to 11 years in prison—the lengthiest term ever imposed on an individual for insider trading violations (United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:02 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Assange was tagged as part of his bail conditions last December. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
Lisa Bail (Goodsill) and I will speak about federal environmental issues and regulatory jurisdiction, including a summary of the Sackett v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:51 am by Eugene Volokh
But the Establishment Clause right to be free from coercion of religious practice remains.Indeed, many courts have held that letting inmates get extra privileges or reduce their sentences by going to Alcoholics Anonymous violates the Establishment Clause (see, among many other cases, Griffin v. [read post]