Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 22,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2018, 6:31 pm
In Yoder v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:34 pm
Supreme Court today in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
" The Appellate Division, however, remanded the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings, explaining that Supreme Court failed to address the Petitioners' request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees.As the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
" The Appellate Division, however, remanded the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings, explaining that Supreme Court failed to address the Petitioners' request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees.As the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
" The Court found that the State did not carry this burden, and that "[i]t is clear federal law did not compel the Regional Board to impose these particular requirements. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:29 pm
Doyle v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:05 am
Although that decision was affirmed by the appellate court, the state supreme court in its review of Adams v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
The Court focused on Radio Corporation of America (RCA) v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:17 am
The four causes of action alleged by the State of New York involved state law claims of fraud and misrepresentation, and the Court stated: ”The party that removes the case bears the burden of establishing that there is a valid basis for federal question jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
The styled of the opinion is Benham Bagheri v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 9:17 am
June Medical Services v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Defendants also failed to meet their heavy burden of establishing that the Commercial Division is unduly burdened or incapable of handling this case. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Defendants also failed to meet their heavy burden of establishing that the Commercial Division is unduly burdened or incapable of handling this case. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 am
ETS Payphones, Inc., 408 F.3d 727, 735 (11th Cir. 2005) (stating that the SEC’s burden for showing the amount subject to disgorgement is “light”). [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:23 pm
In Cuomo v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:37 pm
See, e.g., O’Lone v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
Meanwhile, Shareholders argued that the court should apply an exception to the rule developed by the Court of Appeals in Boland v. [read post]
