Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 22,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
" The Court found that the State did not carry this burden, and that "[i]t is clear federal law did not compel the Regional Board to impose these particular requirements. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 7:46 am
In addition, the State argues that Doss cannot prevail with the burden of proof required in this action. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:34 pm
Supreme Court today in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In Northland Family Planning Center v. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 6:31 pm
In Yoder v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
The executive failed to discharge the burden on it to establish that the interference was justified and did not blunt proportionality. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:23 pm
In Cuomo v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 2:45 pm
The Supreme Court found, among other things, that the State’s burden to overcome the presumption of pretrial release is substantial because “[i]n our society liberty is the norm, and detention prior to trial or without trial is the carefully limited exception. [read post]
30 Jun 2006, 12:00 pm
In Clark v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
Meanwhile, Shareholders argued that the court should apply an exception to the rule developed by the Court of Appeals in Boland v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
In Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
In his ruling of Texas Top Cop Shop Inc. v Garland, Judge Amos L. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
The styled of the opinion is Benham Bagheri v. [read post]
