Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 26,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2020, 10:37 am
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal.4th 348 (2014) (precluding enforcement of PAGA waivers) was “wrongly decided” and no longer good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:37 pm
The recently decided NJ Supreme Court case of State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
The case, Doe v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:35 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
Like here (in a case involving State Farm, no less), here and here. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:13 am
According to the Jackson Clarion-Ledger, the Mississippi state court judge found that plaintiff and its counsel tried to influence the then-trial judge (since imprisoned) through a particular counsel hired for that purpose.According to the article, Eaton will take up the matter on appeal. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:14 pm
Next, Griffith probes counsel on the issue of the duration of the conflict, specifically in light of the court’s language in Ali v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
As the UnitedStates Supreme Court wrote in Chessman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:16 pm
This was apparently influenced as well by a recent New York State Appellate Division ruling in Hoffman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:35 pm
Think the State has a duty to fix a defective traffic light? [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
" But then in House v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:35 am
In light of the issues presented by United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
As both government briefs quickly note, in Michigan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:49 am
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
I recently came across a fascinating Fourth Amendment decision, Frank v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 11:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
