Search for: "State v. London" Results 1141 - 1160 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Both parties referred to dozens of investor-state cases which supported their arguments. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
For instance, a post cited by Mr Hoffman from 9 October 2015 stated Update October 9, 2015: more consultants have left DHR London, and a reliable source has told us that only two of the CTPartners transfers are left: Alex Bennett and Laurence Vallaeys. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:52 am
 Cranford Community College v Cranford College Ltd [2014] EWHC 2999 (IPEC), decided by Judge Richard Hacon on 19 September, is another in the line of swift, simple decisions of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, which demonstrate the virtues of that humble tribunal.Cranford Community College (originally Cranford Community School) had since 1975 been a state secondary school. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 2:26 pm
The waiting begins.Postponed assured trespassers verdict soon(ish).Permanent trespassers and enforceable possession orders.More on London & Quadrant v AnsellWhite v Knowsley - Court of Appeal JudgmentReincarnation of Tenancy? [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:53 am by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal considered itself bound by R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee (2002) EWCA Civ 276 in this, as authority that: If a notice is addressed to A (by his correct name) and sent to A’s proper address, it cannot be treated as a notice given to B. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:39 am by Christine Nielsen Czuprynski
While the substantive claims remain to be decided, the Court considered certain interim matters, including an interim injunction and permission to serve the claim on Google, Inc., incorporated and located in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:20 am
Then save the date and register for the event that The IPKat and Simmons & Simmons are organising together.Based on Darren Meale’s popular Retromark blog posts (Volume I and Volume II), the event will be held at Simmons & Simmons London offices near Moorgate on Wednesday 14 March. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:27 am
  At a hearing three weeks ago, a UK High Court judge set that month as the date for trial in Graiseley Properties Limited v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Among them are: (1) rule of law, (2) constitutional values of states, (3) human rights, (4) war crimes, (5) international justice, (6) influence of national or local laws, (7) protection of national interests v. global governance. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Moseley) v London Borough of Haringey, heard 19 Jun 2014. [read post]