Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
As Annsley explains in this post, that litigation started back in 2012 and focuses on an exciting Rovi's patent - European Patent (UK) No 0, 862,833 - which relates to interactive video communications and viewer-controlled selection of programming information.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:03 pm
v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Wasserman The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
Phillip E. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 7:13 am
Phillips of the Central of District California, based in Riverside, in the 86-page opinion issued yesterday in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:29 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
States Power Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The United States Supreme Court, in Phillips Petroleum Co. v Shutts (472 US 797, 810-811 [1985]), succinctly addressed not only the status of an absent class action plaintiff, but also the relative detachment, and concomitant security, that characterizes that plaintiff's involvement in the litigation. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:22 pm
I am satisfied that the defendants here do not seek a purely tactical advantage, as the Court found in Phillips v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
Phillip, 948 F.2d 241 (U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:52 pm
Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Conway”, “Phillips v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:43 am
And Phillip Morris says smoking is good for you. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
At the end of the hour of argument in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
He had made a similar claim in respect of similar requests in the Nicola Phillips action but Mr Justice Mann held at the end of last year that her proceedings were ”for the infringement of rights pertaining to intellectual property” within the meaning of section 72(2)(a) of the Senior Courts Act1981 and therefore the privilge was not applicable (Phillips v News Group [2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:25 am
LEXIS 18791 (CD CA, Feb. 23, 2007), a California federal Magistrate Judge permitted an inmate to move forward with a claim under RLUIPA that his rights were violated when he was denied time off work to attend Friday Islamic prayer services.In Phillips v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:10 pm
(all from the Law Office of Lee Phillips, P.C.), , and Dan Pochoda (Arizona's ACLU legal director) for filing this Complaint on June 26, 2007, in Dan Ray Frazier v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:28 am
The state of California’s lawyer, Washington attorney Carter G. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because we find that Staunch was not an "eligible employee" under the FMLA and her state law claims are without merit, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment to Continental. 08a0005p.06 Auletta v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:19 pm
., v. [read post]
