Search for: "State v. Wall" Results 1141 - 1160 of 7,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2008, 5:27 pm
This potentially could bode well for the anticipated ruling in Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such procedure. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:25 am
On February 22, 2007, United States District Judge Deborah A. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
[ABC News] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Apple, Apple v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 3:11 am
Further, the statute does not exceed Congress's power under the commerce clause, the court held (United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 8:54 pm by Howard Bashman
Laurie McGinley and Katie Shepherd of The Washington Post report that “FDA eliminates key restriction on abortion pill as Supreme Court weighs case that challenges Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:49 am by lawmrh
Having been a trail rider and around horses the better part of 18 years, on more than one occasion, I’ve seen versions of a cowboy’s code hanging on the wall in someone’s barn or tack room. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that “[t]he Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Virginia law that prohibits uranium mining within the commonwealth’s borders, in a splintered ruling that affirmed the powers of the states to regulate mining on private lands within their territories,” in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by David Markus
S. 143, 147 (1972), what you were wearing, United States v. [read post]