Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2016, 11:05 am
The Compliance with Court Orders Act of 2016 comes in response to the ongoing FBI v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:38 pm
In Zurcher v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
In Zurcher v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
In January 2008, federal agents from several law enforcement agencies raided several locations, including four museums in California. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Circuit in a different case, McKeever v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:56 pm
[ii] See, e.g., State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:44 am
While I wouldn't call it bullying, mostly because I hate this abused word, the reality is that one has to decide whether to stand up for things you believe in and, when someone threatens to take a punch or two, take the hit.The defendants in Rakofsky v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm
It takes the view that “health is a universal human right. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Superior Ct.), a petition for a "harassment restraining order" in California court. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
The developer now urges the court to revisit its open-ended test for assessing regulatory takings under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
California EFF’s Case Page on Riley v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Evans v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin, et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:20 am
Summary of the Facts of the Case of Luis Garcia v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:06 am
But then there are cases like Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Shack and Jacques v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Barristers were reminded of the consequences of offensive social media comments by a decision last week [pdf] to suspend a barrister from practice for 10 months for comments on Facebook. [read post]
