Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2016, 12:28 pm
Upon Lickiss's motion, the federal district court remanded the matter back to the state superior court, ruling that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the case because there is no statute, rule or regulation imposing a duty on FINRA to expunge….Had Lickiss merely petitioned the court for expungement relief under rule 2080, without also invoking the court's equitable powers, that might be the… [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:30 pm
Hackerott, J.D.The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA 38 U.S.C. 4301-4335) [USERRA] afford returning service members protection only during the act of rehiring, ruled the Virginia Supreme Court, in affirming a state trial court’s grant of summary judgment against a deputy sheriff who claimed that her employer failed to sufficiently accommodate her service-related disabilities. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 2:30 pm
By looking to the pleading rules, the court has done defendants with strong positions on the merits a grave disservice. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 12:33 pm
The district court found both falsity by necessary implication and implicit falsity. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:52 am
For instance, corporate defendants have argued (and at least one district court agreed) that the Court’s 2013 decision in Comcast v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:27 pm
The Taliban has claimed responsibility for the attack, in which the attackers wore military uniforms to target security forces. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:53 am
So in my view, the state cases will provide courts with a much richer wellspring of rules and policy considerations, and courts are unlikely to ignore them. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:36 pm
They do not allow for a uniform treatment of all relevant institutions of substantive law and namely their rules on mandatory provisions (art. 9 Regulation “Rome I”, art. 16 Regulation “Rome II”) cannot be activated to this end. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:14 am
Bigstock From Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen), who represented the customer and her husband; here’s an excerpt (some paragraph breaks added): A state District Court in Dallas (Judge Jim Jordan of the 160th District) has struck down a lawsuit over a non-disparagement clause in a form consumer agreement, holding that it could not be enforced against a consumer who expressed dissatisfaction about the service provided by a local business. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 6:52 am
Shaw filed an Answer and Reconventional Demand for Divorce and Permanent Injunction.On October 14, 2014 and April 27, 2015, the district court held a two-day trial on Mr. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Right now, 49 states, the District of Columbia, and many local federal courts have adopted the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct (originally drafted 1983), often with non-uniform changes. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am
Circuit Courts also hear some appeals from County Courts, while others go straight the DCA’s, the District Courts of Appeal. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am
Circuit Courts also hear some appeals from County Courts, while others go straight the DCA’s, the District Courts of Appeal. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 12:40 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. decision, a federal district court held in favor of an employer who was sued under Title VII by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for firing a male-to-female transgender employee. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:16 am
Every day, constitutional rulings are handed down by lower court judges in our country – over 1,000 federal judges and over 10,000 state court judges have the power to hear constitutional claims. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:54 am
The plaintiff in the Nordahl case filed suit in federal district court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:54 am
The plaintiff in the Nordahl case filed suit in federal district court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:46 am
Accordingly, the crew members’ wage claims against McDonalds could proceed to trial under an ostensible agency theory, the court ruled. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
” The court also ruled that that in opposition to any such motion, Marshalls could attempt to show Plaintiff’s substantive claims had no factual merit. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 3:25 am
You can read here my full report on last year’s intermediate appellate court ruling that was reversed last week. [read post]
