Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 4,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Next, Appellants argued the circuit court erred by finding Boehm was not precluded from making substantial alterations to the structure even if Unit B was a nonconforming principal building. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am
Here: UNSR Letter of Allegation Indigenous Prisoners Religious Freedom Excerpt: A pattern of restricting American indigenous prisoners’ religious freedoms is currently occurring throughout the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:46 pm
An amendment that was initially proposed to alter a legal environment that has not existed for decades in the United States but that is somehow still seen as necessary by current proponents hardly has an obvious public meaning. [read post]
SYNTHETIC DRUG BUSTS: FEDERAL ARRESTS FOR FAKE POT AND DESIGNER DRUGS THAT ARE LEGAL UNDER STATE LAW
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:25 am
Eight years later, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Troxel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:16 am
Stiner v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:52 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Hellerstein, J.) granted Kiobel’s petition seeking leave to subpoena Cravath. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:41 am
As to the ex post facto issue, the Court of Appeals explained that the prohibition against ex post facto laws is found in both the United States and Florida constitutions. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
The court did not see fit to alter the interpretation it adopted in Snowden v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:26 am
Kent State University,212 F.3d 1272, 1283 (Fed. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
In this way, any interference was of his own making (this argument had been deployed and accepted in McFeeley v United Kingdom (1980) 3 EHRR 161). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 5:07 am
The court also stated that he would order the United States Probation Office to clean the hard drive before returning computer to [Spink]. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
