Search for: "United States v. California" Results 1141 - 1160 of 13,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2010, 8:52 am by Michael
" The California county is home Toyota's United States headquarters, and will be the location of federal legal actions against the beleaguered auto maker. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Center for Civic Mediation and LA County Bar are presenting a program tonight on the law of arbitration: "Will California Arbitration Law Survive the United States Supreme Court?" [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:24 am by NBlack
C 10-03561 WHA, United States District Court Judge for the Northern District of California, William Alsup, had a lot to say about lawyers using social media to research jurors—and none of it was very positive. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm by Daniel Robertson
July 18, 2011) On March 16, 2015, Judge George Wu of the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied RBS Securities Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Relying on United States v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
”  The name Earl Warren should ring a bell, as he would later become the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, at the time that the Court heard the Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:08 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
   In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:59 pm by The Complex Litigator
United States District Court Judge Susan Illston (Northern District of California) certified a class action alleging violation of Labor Code §§ 203, 226 and 2699. [read post]
However, the validity of the California decision has been questioned by the 2008 United States Supreme Court’s ruling, which held that a defendant had a right to demand live testimony at trial from crime lab technicians who actually performed their tests. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:38 am
  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of all women with claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and back pay employed by Wal-Mart at any time after December 26, 1998, and created a separate opt-out class for punitive damages claims. [read post]