Search for: "United States v. James" Results 1141 - 1160 of 4,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2019, 1:13 pm by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
” [HL Pulse summary] On April 19, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted expedited appeal in Gresham v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 1:28 am
Aka, The Supreme Court and the Challenge of Protecting Minority Religions in the United States, (Reviewing Garrett Epps, To an Unknown God: Religious Freedom on Trial.), 9 The Scholar: St. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:01 am by Mike Scarcella
Most Influential: This week, The National Law Journal spotlights 34 lawyers in 10 practice areas who, as Assistant Managing Editor Michael Moline writes, "are shaping the law, the economy, the physical fabric of the United States and the world. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Public companies outside of the United States often contemplate whether to sell their securities in the US to access new sources of capital. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
” Citing among other things to the Supreme Court’s recent decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act  (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
  Citing more cases from the 19th Century than an opinion by Justice Scalia, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 1:33 pm by James Yang
Patents are viewed as a necessary evil in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Hammond in turn instructed Curaden USA employee Magen James to send the advertisement to the purchased target list of over 46,000 fax numbers. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am by Nicholas Rasmussen
Five years ago today, white supremacist extremists from across the United States traveled to Charlottesville, Virginia for the “Unite the Right” rally. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
We therefore hold that plaintiff's [Larry Shulman] complaint against defendant James Hunderfund must be dismissed. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:25 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Defendants sought to remove the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]