Search for: "United States v. Sharpe" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
   In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales  [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The Supreme Court has steadily been breaking down the once sharp division that it had laid out in 1976, in the case of Buckley v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
United Parcel Service, Inc., 2010 WL 1257931, at *2 (D. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:30 am
United States, a 1910 Supreme Court opinion respecting the then-U.S. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:42 am by Eugene R. Fidell
On May 6, 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal, in an opinion by Sharpe, J.A. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Here is Kim’s guest post:    This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among the reasons frequently cited for the higher incidence of litigation in the United States compared to the rest of the world is the acceptability of contingent fees for plaintiffs’ counsel and general rules that each party to a lawsuit in the U.S. bears its own costs. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:06 am by Chris Jones
The rulings, in class action law suits against the former Wachovia (purchased in early 2009 by Wells Fargo), while not the first major rulings to emanate from mortgage-related business models being pursued at the time of the meltdown, came out of the United States Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, which, is one of the more relevant U.S. [read post]