Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
United States, 533 F. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Competing union interestsBuffalo CSD v Local 264, 270 AD2d 814Suppose an arbitration award in favor of an employee in one collective bargaining unit adversely affects an employee of the same employer in another collective bargaining unit. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:54 pm
The Seventh Circuit in United States v Styles Taylor and Keon Thomas, a case where a jury convicted of capital murder but returned life, ordered a new trial where the Government was held to have violated Batson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:23 am
In Miller v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm
Noncapital United States v Styles Taylor and Keon Thomas, 2011 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Crosstown Music Company 1, LLC v Rive Droite Music Limited, Mark Taylor and Paul Barry (jiplp) Doh! [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Rockwool Limited (Class 46) (IPKat) Copyright confusion (1709 Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation moves to senate floor (Patent Docs) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inventive Step) How will the new House members handle patent reform? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
The plaintiff also advanced Arkansas state pharmacy regulations, but none of these created any duty of pharmacists to warn either patients or prescribing physicians. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:27 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
The actual damage requirement was discussed by the United States Supreme Court in Gertz v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Section 2254(d)(2) of Title 28, United States Code provides federal habeas relief may not be granted on any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in the state courts unless the state court's adjudication of the claim resulted in a decision based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
When the Court first embraced the categoric approach in Taylor v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
National Australia Bank, the Supreme Court deals a fatal blow to ”foreign-cubed” class actions, holding that § 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 does not allow for fraud claims involving transactions on foreign exchanges that occurred outside the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:50 am
Determining membership in a negotiating unit for the purposes of collective bargainingRockland County v Federation of Teachers Local 1817, 275 AD2d 413Clearly the incumbents of positions in the negotiating unit are covered by collective bargaining contracts negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law.Is an agreement between the parties to include a particular individual in the negotiating unit if the position filled by that individual is not included in the… [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm
One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
