Search for: "Williams v. United States" Results 1141 - 1160 of 6,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
One of his legal advisors put it bluntly: “We’re waiting for the United States Supreme Court—of which the President has nominated three justices—to step in and do something. [read post]
The Project is owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and discharges significant quantities of selenium and other pollutants into state and federal wildlife refuges leading into the Delta. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons Once the networks called the presidential election for Joe Biden over the weekend, something dawned on me. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
And it cannot prevent Congress from determining who the rightful electors are and discharging its exclusive responsibility to say who will serve as the next President of the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am by SHG
No Supreme Court case before 2000 ever tried this maneuver to upend a decision by a state court on state law, and in Bush v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Likewise, the only one of President Nixon's appointees to recuse in United v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Likewise, the only one of President Nixon's appointees to recuse in United v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm by Scott R. Anderson
Chief Justice William Rehnquist articulated this view in his concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:18 am by SHG
Historically, it is an accurate description of public square free speech issues in the United States from the 1950’s until today. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:27 am by Samuel Bray
This morning, for the fourth time in the last two decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has granted certiorari to address the legality of the national injunction. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 5:58 pm by Matt Cooper
Texas: In Texas League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am by Marcia Coyle
The Democratic Party platform that election year called for the overturning of Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Schmidt’s Donald Trump v. the United States report that Mueller was prevented from exploring that avenue by then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.] [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Despite the asymmetry between the two books, two concerns unite them that deserve critical treatment. [read post]