Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2016, 10:10 am
In other words, the dollars need not be in one’s hand if he or she can exert control over the item in question. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:10 am
In other words, the dollars need not be in one’s hand if he or she can exert control over the item in question. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 9:45 am
”* See Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222Attorney for Petitioner: Julia R. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 11:07 am
Kuligoski v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
During this time, Stacy's parents sometimes visited her at college, but their attitude toward Stacy's relationship with Marc did not change. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am
But some of that work was as a consultant to Thurgood Marshall in preparing the Supreme Court case Brown v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm
S. 806, 813 (1996). [3] Terry v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:52 am
Cohen v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
” In other words, even retweets are ostensibly prohibited. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:34 am
Classic Liquor Importers, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Collective bargaining under the Taylor Law: submitting demands characterized as new or regressive after post-impasse fact-findingBuffalo Teachers Federation v Buffalo City School District, PERB U-34445Buffalo City School District v Buffalo Teachers Federation, PERB U-34462 On July 21, 2015, The Buffalo Teachers Federation [BTF] filed an improper practice charge with the New York Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:01 pm
Behrend and Chaos on the Ground, 81 U. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
” 9 In other words, DOJ, you’ve just recommended that composers breach their licensing agreements with their own PRO’s. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
Now, we have all done this research, and in the Southern District alone there is a case standing for the proposition for and against every conceivable amount of time you like as being too much delay, not enough delay, and ju-u-u-u-u-ust right. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 3:43 am
Rather, it comes from the Supreme Court’s 1993 ruling in Harris v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
S. 35, 47 (1975) (Marshall, J., concurring) (citing Morissette, 342 U. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:26 am
New Jersey takes a similar approach, noting that “[u]pon the sale of a business a restrictive covenant …is assignable without express words to that effect and passes as an incident of the business sold even though not specifically assigned” and should “be assignable as an incident of the business even if not made so by express words. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:26 am
New Jersey takes a similar approach, noting that “[u]pon the sale of a business a restrictive covenant …is assignable without express words to that effect and passes as an incident of the business sold even though not specifically assigned” and should “be assignable as an incident of the business even if not made so by express words. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm
Florida International University Board of Trustees v. [read post]
