Search for: "X, Y " Results 1141 - 1160 of 4,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
“Then time will tell just who fellAnd who’s been left behind”                   Dylan, “Most Likely You Go Your Way” (1966)   When the Daubert case headed to the Supreme Court, it had 22 amicus briefs in tow. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
The IRS’s mаіn gоаl is to collect the mаxіmum аmоunt оf tаxеѕ from уоu wіth mіnіmаl effort. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:51 pm
Bank X may decide not to accept anything less than a Certificate in order to authorize the Estate Trustees to deal with a bank account of the deceased, for example, while Bank Y may be satisfied with a certified copy of the will appointing them. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:22 pm by José Guillermo
QUINTA CUESTIÓN: El bien jurídico protegido es la sociedad, específicamente la economía nacional, pues ingresaría al circuito comercial "X cantidad de dinero" que no ha producido bien alguno que lo justifique y por tanto un componente más de la inflación. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:45 am
It might be X is slightly less bad than Y. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 10:10 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
TSDR 5597778 THE LIZTON SIGN SHOP TSDR 5593836 THE CURB MUNCHER TSDR 5597344 TSDR 5597340 DORMSTALL, DS (LOGO) TSDR 5593817 D MOBILE SUITES TSDR 5593534 FORCE TSDR 5593533 FORCE TSDR 5597164 SPECTRA TSDR 5597151 MOLD TOXKLEAR TSDR 5597086 OT WEAR PERFORMANCE APPAREL TSDR 5593253 VENTADOME TSDR 5597707 TRAFFIC CLOUD TSDR 5596644 OA MY WAY TSDR 5596598 PRIME BUBBLE-X TSDR 5596441 IP INDYPRO LIFTS & EQUIPMENT TSDR 5592869 FIRST FRANCHISE CAPITAL CORPORATION TSDR 5592868 FIRST FRANCHISE… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 7:57 am by David Oxenford
“candidate X is a big-spending liberal” or “candidate Y doesn’t care about our kids as he has voted against school funding increases 12 times”) are less likely to be actionable than are claims about the character, integrity and similar personal qualities of a candidate (e.g., a claim that a candidate did something illegal). [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:03 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Prospecting in the domain of no gain Knowing that Mr A also trades as Mr B and is secretary of X Ltd and also director of Y Ltd, while appearing simultaneously to be involved with a number of other companies, even charities, does not really advance the old-fashioned case I deal with of a woman and three kids, sitting in a homelessness unit after having her locks changed by an ill-defined person who may or may not be randomly connected to Mr B, or may not even really exist. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
  If you do X, and there's a statute that expressly says that doing X is a misdeameanor, then you can't be charged with the more general felony Y -- even if what you did technically counts as a violation of Y. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:00 pm by Sherri A. Affrunti
Scheduling of earned sick leave may only be required in advance if the need for the leave is foreseeable – and in those limited instances, an employer may (x) require 7 days’ advance notice of the need and duration of the leave, (y) request reasonable efforts be undertaken to schedule the leave in a manner that does not disrupt the employer’s business operations, and (z) prohibit use of sick leave on certain dates (the “black-out dates”). [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 8:01 am by José Guillermo
" Tal afirmación no es consistente, pues la inconstitucionalidad no sólo la deja sin efecto sino que, al hacerlo el TC no se pronuncia sobre las normas que derogó, por tanto, la decisión si se aplica o no es  interpretativa, veamos si el Congreso deroga la Ley "x" que antes estaba  regulada por la Ley "y", no es posible por sentido común que la ley "y" siga vigente, en consecuencia, si la… [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 9:25 am by Raymond McKenzie
Provide Defendant’s federal and state income tax returns for the years x, y and z, including any Schedules thereto, whether such returns were filed individually or jointly. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:42 pm by José Guillermo
Nº 248 -2018/SUNAT.- Autorizan viaje de trabajadores de la SUNAT a Ecuador, en comisión de servicios TENEMOS DIECINUEVE MINISTERIOS Y "X" número de instituciones dependientes de éstos. hagan números amigos. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
A big part of our business is strategizing with and advising healthcare startups  (for example, a telemedicine company; a medical spa; the developer of a healthcare app—such as, the app analyzes whether your particular genetic makeup predisposes you for a better result with therapy X vs. therapy Y for condition Z) to devise the most efficient “go to market” strategies that conserve capital, save time and keep them out of hot water with the FDA and believe it… [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
 So, to recap, X and Y had a contract. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 1:57 pm by Adam Levitin
If Firm X defaults on its loan, it doesn't affect the value of a loan to Firm Y or of Firm Y itself, any more than your default on an auto loan affects the value of my auto loan or my car. [read post]